ROE Make all the Difference

Whenever you enter any kind of conflict of any kind, one of the most important things you can have is a clear understanding of the Rules Of Engagement (ROE).  Those who are unfamiliar with this military term would do well to learn a bit about it, since the concept easily translates into any argument, disagreement, or situation in the civilian world and can be quite useful.

Simply put, ROE are a set of guidelines that control behavior and options when interacting with others who are combative or competitive.  They act as a collection of high-level instructions that control and organize actions and reactions.  They draw lines in the sand that prevent certain responses unless the other guy steps across the boundary.

Most people, whether they realize it or not, have internal ROE.  If we had absolutely no ROE, then our actions would be 100% unpredictable, and we wouldn't have any sense of restraint at all.  Many violent criminals suffer from a lack of ROE - without ROE guiding their actions, they respond in ways that many others see as "unwarranted", "excessive", or "over the top" - and then they go to jail.  (Or they are featured as pointy-nosed cartoon characters.)

I was thinking today about the irony that liberals accuse conservatives of being violent thugs who long for combat and civil disorder, while the vast majority of such unfortunate behavior has come and currently comes from their side of the political aisle both here and around the world.  And it's not just those at the heads of governments and organizations that roll that way, but individuals!  It's really annoying and it is going to lead to several unfortunate consequences...

A Victory of Free Speech

The only sane verdict has been reached in the Geert Wilders trial in Holland!  He was acquitted of all five charges of hate-speech.  What did he say?  He spoke publicly about the rise and impact of militant Islam in Holland and across Europe.  As someone who lived in the Netherlands for three years and who also is concerned with the spread of totalitarian Islam and stealth jihad, I have followed this case for some time now.

I am glad that there is still such a thing as freedom of speech in Europe - to have lost this battle would have been a crushing blow for the free democracies of the West (as we are called and loosely grouped).  I'm sure that those who brought charges up against Mr. Wilders will not go quietly, and this fact is evidenced by the 24-hour security guards that the man must now live with.

Still it is wonderful news and I applaud it.

Who's Laughing Now?

Vegetables are out to get rid of the human race!  Oh , noes!  I knew it...

For years I have been deeply suspicious of veggies.  They are green.  Usually when someone says, "Hey!  This food is all green!" don't most people narrow their eyes and ask what's wrong with it?  In my experience with people, the answer is "Yes."

Some vegetables are closely related to poisonous flora.  Like Hemlock, that vile plant that ended Socrates' life - a first cousin to Tomatoes.  It makes one wonder...  Would you go out with the sibling of a known serial killer?  Yikes!  It's better not to take the risk!

Don't get me wrong.  I enjoy some veg.  Some of my best friends are veggies, in fact.  (If you've heard this one before, feel free to stop me...)  OK, I'll stop.

An Instructive Moment

Osama bin Laden was finally put down like the rabid animal that he was.  I applaud and salute the efforts that this fine bit of intelligence-analysis and operational-expertise represents - especially to all those men and women whose jobs are so classified that we will never know their names.  Thank you.

I believe that those who attack America should take this as an instructional moment.  This bloody event is not a surprise to those of us who were born here.  Deep down, Americans knew that once we identified the murdering jerk who sent his mindless and brainwashed minions to attack our people on 9-11 that we would kill him.  No matter how long it took.  No matter how much it cost.  Because that's the kind of people we are.

Americans are the nicest bunch of people you could hope to met, generally speaking.  But if you attack us in some kind of murderous sucker punch, then we will come after you like a robotic Terminator-dog with a drooling problem.  You can run and you can hide.  But all this will do for you in the long run is guarantee that you die tired and afraid.  Just like OBL, may he enjoy his very own personal weenie-roast in Hades...

So future terrorists, take note.  Once you poke the American bear - you're dead meat.  You'd better have your house in order.  Because those pleasant folks in the USA won't stop until you have paid for what you have done.  It's a given over here - a part of who we are.

You may tell me, "You're crazy!"  To which, I reply, "That's right.  And don't you forget it..."

The Thought Police Have Been Greenlit

Perhaps you have read 1984 or Brave New World?  I enjoyed the latter more than the former because it seemed a bit more believable.  1984 was just too far-fetched for me to suspend my disbelief and came across more as a future fantasy than a future possibility.

I guess I was wrong about the fantasy.  The thought police has just been declared 100% constitutional for this country.  Say what?

In deeming that the ObamaCare individual mandate (the requirement that each person in America have their own health insurance) was constitutional and hunky-dory, a federal judge had these words of wisdom to say:

"As previous Commerce Clause cases have all involved physical activity, as opposed to mental activity, i.e. decision-making, there is little judicial guidance on whether the latter falls within Congress’s power. ... However, this Court finds the distinction, which Plaintiffs rely on heavily, to be of little significance.  ...  It is pure semantics to argue that an individual who makes a choice to forgo health insurance is not 'acting,' especially given the serious economic and health-related consequences to every individual of that choice.  Making a choice is an affirmative action, whether one decides to do something or not do something."
     -- Judge Kessler remarks in his ruling on Civil Action No. 10-950 (p.45)

So this fellow is saying that the federal government CAN regulate mental activities and choices!?

Wow.  It boggles the mind...  When the whole HealthCare thing was being debated, the opponents who said it would lead, slippery-slope-like, to the government forcing us to buy whatever they wanted to seemed, I dunno', a bit on the fantasy-side to me.  But apparently the slope didn't slide far enough for this guy - the upshot of this ruling is that he thinks the federal government has the authority to control EVERY decision we make or don't make.

Right...  About that...

Two little questions:
1) Where do you think this level of absolute tyranny will lead?
2) How the heck do you plan on enforcing it, bub?

Hey, Judge Kessler?  I'm mentally sending some 'illegal' thoughts your way!

Trains?

What is up with all the talk about train networks being the solution?  Do our leaders think that we can't travel in this country without a new, high-speed train network?

No, that can't be right.  They must be aware that:
A) We already can travel where and when we need to.
B) If running a high-speed train network was profitable, someone would already being making money doing it.
C) Passenger trains have sucked money for years - they run at staggering losses that are made up for by the taxpayer.
D) Most Americans own one or more of their own vehicles and we have the world's best roadway network.

Surely they realize that our cars are more than a symbol of our freedom, they actually enable personal freedom.  Why would they want to get rid of...  Oh, wait.  I get it...

How to Fight Stealth Jihad

Each of us needs to stand up for our country and our way of life.  There are forces at work that want nothing less than the total destruction of the liberties and freedoms we love so well.  The enemy is not standing clearly in the light for all to see, but is instead slinking through the shadows, avoiding attention as much as possible, and throwing out red herrings at every opportunity.  I'm talking about the sticky spread of Creeping Shari'a and the continuing assaults of Stealth Jihad.  I think first we should define both of these terms.

Creeping Shari'a is the method of slowly substituting the laws of a country for those of Shari'a.  The results are easy to see in many European nations as their populations are beginning to find themselves living in a country that applies Islamic religious law to non-Muslims.  The same sorts of things are being attempted here, but with less success so far.  Here are a couple of links to some recent results of Creeping Shari'a in Norway and Denmark.

Stealth Jihad is the preferred method of attack being used against America and many of the European democracies today.  Instead of physical violence and attacks, the culture itself is undermined and weakened using the freedoms that are present within it.  Once a nation so targeted is weak enough, the destruction of the infidel (that's us, by the way) can take place through more conventional methods.  But don't take my word for it - this is how Mohamed Akram of the Muslim Brotherhood defines this plan in chapter 4 of his book, Explanatory Memorandum: On the General Strategic Goal for the Group,

"The process of settlement is a 'Civilization-Jihadist Process' with all the word means. The Ikhwan [Muslim Brotherhood] must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and 'sabotaging' its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated..."
   (Translated from Arabic.)

Clearly we face opponents that are serious about wrecking our culture and us as a people.  Luckily, Americans do not sit around and take this kind of threat meekly - we fight!  And therein lies our opportunity.  Right now the conflict that is on-going in this country is a cold war (lots of talk and political maneuvering, but no bullets are flying), but if we wait until they feel their strategy has weakened us it will turn into a hot war.  There is no question in my mind as to which type of war I'd prefer to fight on American soil!  To win the war while it is still cold, we need to fight smart.

In order to fight smart, we must have more than raw courage and anger over this unwarranted aggression - we must know who we need to resist, what we need to resist, why we need to resist, how we can resist effectively, and when will we know that the fight is over.  Let's talk about each of these requirements and get our game face on!

The Impact of Instant Communications

We live in an increasingly complex world.  One area of our lives where this accelerating change is very visible and close to home is how we communicate with each other.  Since the ability to communicate is central to the formation and the function of any civilization or relationship, how this is happening and what it portends should be of interest to us all.  I see five trends occurring that are driving change right now: Just-In-Time Information, Artificial Memory Assistants, Distance Fuzziness, Faceless Communication, and Digital Thinking.

A quick look at history may help to see where I'm going with this.  As communication media developed, they allowed for totally new possibilities throughout history.  The ability to speak led to trade.  The ability to write led to kingdoms.  The ability to 'sign' documents with an identifiable signet led to empires.

Think for a moment about how radically the world changed with each of the following communication innovations:

The printing press Newspapers Postal services

Personal computers Email services The Internet

The telegraph The telephone The cellular phone

Each one of these brought about a huge shift in the way nations and people did their business, handled their relationships, and discovered information in general.  Something that may not be quite as apparent is how it changed the people themselves.  In the use of each medium listed above, the new communication method brought the persons using it closer to the raw information itself and that changed their attitudes and their behaviors.  Additionally, the innovations that had the deepest penetration into people's lives (meaning many more people used it or had access to it), are the ones that changed cultures the most.

It's happening again.  A wave of change in human and cultural behavior caused by the widespread availability and use of cell phones, smart phones, email, the Internet, and other similar devices and mediums is happening right now.  Our increasing ability to communicate instantaneously is having a tangible sociological effect.  My perspective on these trends can be summed up in five ideas:

Respect for Dr. King!

Martin Luther King Jr. embodied the majority of the good and Godly qualities that so many of us strive for and so few of us attain.  Dr. King's personal hero was Mahatma Gandhi, but he didn't simply copy his footsteps in the quest for justice.  He put an American spin on things that resonates with me deeply.

Today we celebrate the Reverend's life, his work, but most of all his mission.  As a family tradition, we always either listen to or watch a video of the "I have a dream" speech he made on the capital steps, which I believe captures the core of his attitude for all mankind so well.  The words and the emotion behind them moves me powerfully and I get teary-eyed every time, especially that last line: 

And when this happens, when we allow freedom to ring, when we let it ring from every village and every hamlet, from every state and every city, we will be able to speed up that day when all of God's children, black men and white men, Jews and Gentiles, Protestants and Catholics, will be able to join hands and sing in the words of the old Negro spiritual, "Free at last! free at last! thank God Almighty, we are free at last!"

So long as his dream stays alive in our hearts, the world will be a better place.

The Prince

I have many favorite books.  One that I fell in love with the first time I read it was The Prince, by Niccolò Machiavelli. Written in 1532, this timeless classic was groundbreaking on many levels.  It describes the methods tyrants use to get power and wield it.  He was arguably the first to separate politics from theology.  And the lessons one can learn from his short essays on various topics are just as timely today as they were to Florance, Italy during the Renaissance.

I own four different translations and I read it twice a year.  I pick up something useful every time I go through it.

Knowing a bit about the Midici family who were so central to his upbringing and later events in his life make the work more meaningful to me, personally, but there is no denying that the man was a genius all on his own. 

This work is widely misquoted and misunderstood - and has been ever since it was published.  The most common insult is that it is a manual for how to be a tyrant, but that is as incorrect as saying that a history book about ancient Egypt is a manual that recommends incest among the ruling class.  No, he merely outlined how tyrants behave to give the reader a better understanding of what leaders motivations are and their likely behaviors in the future.  Interestingly enough, his take on leaders is still spookily relevant - meaning we as humans aren't as "progressive" and "modern" as we'd like to think we are.

Here's a little something that caught my eye this morning:

"And he who becomes master of a city accustomed to freedom and does not destroy it, may expect to be destroyed by it, for in rebellion it has always the watch-word of liberty and its ancient privileges as a rallying point, which neither time nor benefits will ever cause it to forget.  And what ever you may do or provide against, they never forget that name or their privileges unless they are disunited or dispersed but at every chance they immediately rally to them..."

This is precisely why our own government keeps having swings to the right and to the left.  Both sides believe that their own way of living is true "freedom", but neither has the ability to permanently destroy their ideological foes when they assume power.  This ensures that our nation will continue to be a political battleground with rebellions of thought and policy being the norm - rather than the exception.  And despite what you may think or hear on the news, this is perfectly natural for America!  It's a far better system than a bloodbath after every election (a'la eighteenth-century France).  Not a bad insight for a guy who's been dead for 400 years, eh?

If you've never read it yourself, may I recommend it?  It's a short read, and you'll likely enjoy yourself!

Dating Classifications

I've had an internal method of classifying dates for a while, and I thought I'd share it.  You may think that my trying to quantify "fun" is a hopeless, quixotic quest, but there are good reasons for looking at dating in an objective way.

Sometimes in a relationship we begin to feel like we are "in a rut", yearn for the way we once felt with our partner, or have a vague sense of boredom.  These unsettling feelings of discontent are difficult to understand as to how they happened and how to change them.  In order to get a handle on these feelings (or prevent them from arising - which is my preference) we need a framework that makes sense to us.  This gives a modicum of context for otherwise nebulous feelings that we can talk about, measure, and adjust!  I realize that those who are perfectly in touch with their feelings don't need this kind of crutch - but I certainly do and I'm sure I'm not alone.

When talking about dating there is first the assumption on my part that it is occurring.  If you are in a relationship and not spending time with your significant other on what you both call "dates" then you should reconsider this omission!  A relationship must return to and rely upon it's root if it is to survive.  And for most of us the roots of our relationships are based on spending time with each other - usually in the form of dating.  Ignore the roots of your relationship and you'll quickly find that it dries up and withers away.

To my way of thinking there are two aspects of a date that are easy to measure and give us useful data: the level of planning that went into the date's preparation and the level of intensity of the date itself.  I have arranged these areas in the chart below.

Usually, the planning of a date is done prior to the event and it's pretty clear how much time was spent.  From least planned to most planned the levels are: Retro-active, Spontaneous, Minimal, Moderate, and Massive.  The two least planned aren't really planned at all, but that's okay.

The intensity of a date is very subjective, with the participants of the date likely ranking it differently at least some of the time.  From least intense to most intense the levels are: Relaxed, Mild, Tangy, Spicy, and Hot.  This is pure chemistry.  There is no way to guarantee results beforehand, and you want to avoid huge disparities in how intense you both feel the date is while you are on it.  The idea is to come together on dates, not just be together - feeling totally different things in close proximity to one another!

Do Moral Codes Fail?

This is a pet peeve of mine: I do not enjoy seeing people fall down and I don't like seeing other people enjoy it either.  And they do it in one of two ways, usually - both of which are uncool.

When folks have some kind of scandal come out and the revelations are nasty, ugly, or embarrassing - why do those of us that follow a similar moral code sometimes stand around clucking at the horror of it all and telling the poor schmuck that they should have done better at living the way he knew he was supposed to.  I mean, we've all done nasty, ugly, and embarrassing things, right?  The only difference is we don't usually get caught and held under some kind of massive spotlight.  Have some compassion and use it as an excuse for self-reflection and self-correction, huh?

That's one side of the human response to seeing someone fail to live up to their ideals that I don't like.  The other side is even worse!  People who normally either ignore, condone, or excuse the bad behavior, when they see it in others, will start crowing that the stupid sap's moral code failed to work - and therefore no one should adhere to it.  This of course, is absurd - it doesn't even qualify as a logical fallacy - that's how much it sucks.  Nope, all this statement reveals is a startling lack of understanding of basic language.

You see, when someone follows a moral code and they make a mistake it is a failure to APPLY the moral code, not a failure OF the moral code. 

That's what caused the trouble.  Not living it.  Duh.  And how is just giving up on a ideal so much better than actually trying for something better?

How do people get that mixed up?!?

The bottom line is this: I hope everyone gets a little bit better (by whatever measure they care to apply) each and every day.  I hope that we all become a bit stronger by learning from our own mistakes.  And I hope that we can learn from other people's mistakes so we don't have to learn everything the hardest way possible!

/rant

Bare Minimum PC Checklist

It amazes me how often I am asked for computer advice.  Being a geek, I guess I don't think about it much.  Like most human beings, I assume that everyone knows the same things that I do.

To save time and in the interests of efficiency, here is a list of the things that should be put on any new computer and some key things to know.  These utilities, tools, and methods will ensure security, enable full access to the power of the machine, and simplify maintenance.

Blog Division!

My blog has ripped into two new entities!  It's amazing!  The Funhouse will remain right here and continue to please and delight you with it's surrealality, but all of the family stuff has moved to a lighter, softer blog.

Be sure to keep up with all the things going on at both locations from now on!

Core American Values (As I See Them)

As I have mentioned in prior posts, I am somewhat active in grassroots politics.  And nowhere have I found a more succinct explanation of what my own ideas about the core American values are (full disclosure: they are quite conservative) than in Bill Whittle's "What We Believe" videos.  Not only does he hit the nail on the head over and over again - he does it in an entertaining and stylish manner.  His sincere love of this country and what it stands for is bold.  I feel inspired by his optimism and vision of the future - not just for America, but for all mankind.  The series talks about seven different topics: Small Government and Free Enterprise, The Problem of Elitism, Wealth Creation, Natural Law, Gun Rights, Immigration, and American Exceptionalism.

Whether you are curious about what those crazy Tea-Partiers are thinking, want to better understand your ideological foes, want some ideas of how to clearly express yourself as a conservative, or you just want to watch something engaging and enjoyable - these videos will satisfy you.  I've been a reader of Bill Whittle's for many years now and he's just an all-around impressive guy.  His written articles are usually quite a bit of writing and take a bit to absorb, but they are all excellently done.  Here's a list of my favorites (Note: Unlike his videos, some of his articles have a bit of 'spicy' language - he's a passionate guy):

• The first article of his that I ever read was about political game theory - and it's awesome!!!
• The power of iconography (the use of images as symbols).  Really cool stuff.
• The destructive influence of tribalism in America and how to turn it into a plus.
• The mutual exclusivity of freedom and justice (it's all about trade-offs in the end).
• Reasonable men - historical tidbits about our founding fathers concerning current topics.

Do a search on youtube or goggle for "Bill Whittle" and you'll find a bunch more - he's smart, clear, inspiring, and entertaining.  Just thought I'd share!

Multi-Part, Mood-Based Gifts

With the approach of Christmas, the giving of gifts is on my mind.  Allow me to share one of my favorite romantic gift-giving strategies with you.  It works well and can make any offering much more meaningful for both you and the one receiving it.

When giving a gift to my wife, I like to break it up into several smaller gifts, each labeled to be opened when she is in a specific mood.  This allows her to select the gift that she feels like opening, depending on how she is feeling at the moment and saving the rest for later.  I call this kind of present a "multi-part, mood-based gift".  There are many advantages to giving a lady this type of gift collection.

The Technological Singularity

The Technological Singularity is an event in human history that will occur in our lifetime.  It will change just about everything for just about everyone.  Those who know me perhaps will have heard me ask, "Are you acceleration aware?"  People who are aware can be a bit more prepared and a bit less fearful of this event.  Unfortunately, most people don't even know what this upcoming event is or what it means.  Let's jump in, shall we?

I think the first half of the term "Technological Singularity" is pretty clear - we're talking about technology.  The singularity part is what is so darn interesting.  A singularity is a black hole.  A warping of normal Einstein space-time by a point so massive that nothing can escape it, not even light.  Anything that gets too close is sucked in and can't escape.  The edge of this point-of-no-return is called the event horizon.  Modern science has some speculation about what goes on past this point, but it is impossible, by definition, to see what really lies beyond it.  Due to the unreal levels of radiation, pressure, and velocity, whatever it is like is agreed to be unlike anything, anywhere else in the known universe.  The normal rules of physics do not apply.  Mathematical models that define reality break down.  Key elements of how we perceive time and space become totally meaningless.

The Technological Singularity is an event of intelligence innovation that we can't see beyond.  No amount of forecasting, study, or research can tell us what anything will be like beyond its development.  As the pace at which invention and the expansion of human knowledge increases, we draw ever nearer to this event.  Life after this event will be different - substantially and fundamentally different.  As The Futurist writes, it is "the event when the rate of technological change becomes human-surpassing, just as the advent of human civilization a few millenia ago surpassed the comprehension of non-human creatures."  In other words, those humans who live in a post-singularity world will be as incomprehensible to us as we are currently to chipmunks.

Given this brief introduction, I'd like to cover four basic points that you need to focus on, at a minimum, in order to take advantage of being acceleration aware:

The McCumber Model

There have been many different methods proposed as a framework for information security.  One that makes the most sense to me is The McCumber Model (created by John McCumber).  The factors to consider are arranged in a cube, with each axis representing a different perspective of any information security problem and each axis having three primary components.  It ends up looking like a Rubik's cube.  27 little cubes all stacked together.

The three axes are: Desired Goals, States of Information, and Counter-measures.

By looking at things from the perspective of the intersection of the three axes, you can be sure to look at all sides of an information security issue.  Pick any of the smaller 27 cubes and think about the problem or concerns from that perspective.

The Great Totalitarian Threat of our Time

I am an open-minded and tolerant person, like most Americans.  However, there is one thing that we can’t safely tolerate.  That is tyranny or totalitarian influences that would destroy the ability to be open-minded or tolerant.

Although some Islamic groups/sects are trying to break away from militant Islam, there are far too many within the faith who either condone or celebrate terrorism committed in the name of their faith.  Since my personal experience with Islam is limited, I began to study it about three years ago.

It's never a good idea to learn about someone or something from their enemies.  (Get your information straight from the source, that’s what I say!)  I read the Qur’an.  I studied Islam in general.  I read the writings of proponents and opponents of the faith and have come to my own conclusions (mostly that the truth is very difficult to find indeed).  The Qur'an is a long read, and I know that not everyone has the time, or the patience, to read it.  Still, I recommend it.

I learned that there are three concepts of Islam that are very important to understand as an American or Westerner.  1) Islam is not fundamentally a peaceful religion that was hijacked by militant members.  The Qur'an encourages violent acts towards non-believers.  2) Instituting world-wide Shari'a Law is a religious duty for all Muslims.  To live under any other form of government is considered a sin.  3) Muslims are allowed (and in some cases encouraged) to deceive non-Muslims if it helps their religion.  This principle is called Taqiyya - a term you might want to remember.  To get a nice overview of these concepts, check out this short video on YouTube.  

A Conflict of Visions

I read a lot of books each year, but most of them are just 'popcorn'.  Light, crunchy snacks for my brain that are more relaxing to consume than educational.  The ones that are really awesome are the more difficult tomes.  Let me tell you about one of the most fantastic books I read last year: "A Conflict of Visions: Ideological Origins of Political Struggles", by Thomas Sowell.

I was first of all pleasantly surprised that the book, although about politics, did not favor one ideology over another.  If you have read political books, then you know that this is as rare as a flying dump truck!  My next surprise was in the depth and ease with with the author reduces hundreds of years of political conflict into such a simple framework.  It helped me to understand those with opposing viewpoints in ways I never thought I would.  With understanding came a softer approach on my part towards people I normally wanted to either A) punch in the face or B) simply ignore.

While professing not to be constructing a rigid dichotomy, Sowell lays out a way of distinguishing people's political perspective in a manner that holds together very well under most conditions.  He describes two visions of human nature which lead to political conflict, arguing that it is the vision of what mankind is and what he can become that drives our choices.

The two visions are the "constrained vision", in which human nature is enduring and self-centered, and the "unconstrained vision", in which human nature is malleable and perfectible.  Interestingly enough, in my own further analysis and study I have found that once someone in my acquaintance is identified by me as seeing humanity by one of these visions, that almost all of the other aspects pointed out by Sowell actually do follow in their attitudes, beliefs, and actions.